日本が50年前に核保有を検討していた話【核武装の現実性】

日本が50年前に核保有を検討していた話【核武装の現実性】
https://surfshark.jp/partner/syakaibu
特別価格でSurfsharkが利用出来ます。プロモコード「syakaibu」を入力すると、3か月分が無料+30日間の返金保証が付属します。ぜひご活用ください。

参考文献
「NHKスペシャル」取材班. (2012). “核”を求めた日本:被爆国の知られざる真実. 光文社.
外務省 (Ed.). (2010). 「“核”を求めた日本」報道において取り上げられた文書等に関する外務省調査報告書. 外務省H.P.
外務省外交政策企画委員会. (1969). わが国の外交政策大綱.
外務省国際資料部調査課 (Ed.). (1969). 第1回日独政策企画協議要録.
黒崎輝. (2006). 核兵器と日米関係:アメリカの核不拡散外交と日本の選択1960-1976. 有志舎.
黒崎輝. (2015). 日本核武装研究(一九六八年)とは何だったか・組織的・財政的可能性:米国政府の分析との比較の視点から. 182, 125–139.
佐藤太久磨. (2022). 「自主的核武装」論と「非核武装国連盟」論──NPT反対論の政治思想と敗戦後日本. 立命館大学人文科学研究所紀要(立命館大学人文科学研究所), 133, 255–289.
大臣官房総務課. (2008). 佐藤総理訪米関係(1965.1)会談関係. A’.1.5.2.12-2. 外交史料館本館
内閣官房内閣情報調査室. (1968). 日本の核政策に関する基礎的研究:独立核戦力創設の技術的・組織的・財政的可能性.
中島真司. (2020). IAEA保障措置と我が国の取組み. 保障措置実施に係る連絡会. 原子力規制庁保障措置室.
春名幹男. (2010). 名大最終講義 核密約と報道. メディアと社会第2号. 名古屋大学大学院国際言語文化研究科.
マイク・ヘンドリク・シュプロッテ. (2016). 日独外務省政策企画協議と日本の核武装問題 : エゴン・バールと 1969 年の日本訪問. European Studies, Vol.15, 29–41.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1963, June 28). “Likelihood and Consequences of a Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Systems.” National Intelligence Estimate Number 4-63.
Central Intelligence Agency. (1966, January 20). “The Likelihood of Further Nuclear Proliferation.” National Intelligence Estimate, NIE 4-66. Wilson Center Digital Archive.
Department of State. (1962, October 1). “Japan’s Reaction to a Chinese Nuclear Detonation.” Bureau of Intelligence and Research.
Department of State. (1964, June 26). “Japan, Volume 2, Cables, 5/64 – 11/64 [2 of 2],” Country Files, NSF, Box 250 [1 of 2], , LBJ Presidential Library, 2023.
Department of State. (1964, December 12). “Background Paper on Factors Which Could Influence National Decisions Concerning Acquisition of Nuclear Weapons.” National Archives and Records service. Folder, “A Way of Thinking about Nuclear Proliferation (Rostow),” Committee Files, NSF, Box 1, LBJ Presidential Library.
Department of State. (1965, January 26). “Japan, Sato’s Visit Memos and Cables, 1/11-14/65 [3 of 4],” Country Files, NSF, Box 253 [1 of 2], , LBJ Presidential Library.
Department of State. (1965, November 4). “Addendum INR Contribution to NIE 4-65 Likelihood of Further Nuclear Proliferation.” State Department FOIA release.
Furukawa, K. (2010). Japan’s Policy and Views on Nuclear Weapon: Historical Perspective. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics, & Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, 1–30.
Gong, Gerrit., Harrison, Selig., Manning, Robert., & Wright, David. (1998). “China/Japan/Korea – Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States. Appendix III: Unclassified Working Papers.”
Green, & Furukawa, K. (2022). Japan: New Nuclear Realism. In The Long Shadow (pp. 347–372). Stanford University Press.
Kase. (2001). The costs and benefits of Japan’s nuclearization: An insight into the 1968/70 internal report. The Nonproliferation Review, 8(2), 55–68.
Hymans. (2011). Veto Players, Nuclear Energy, and Nonproliferation: Domestic Institutional Barriers to a Japanese Bomb. International Security, 36(2), 154–189.
IAEA. (2021). IAEA Annual Report 2021.
Lacouture, Jean. (1991). De Gaulle: The Ruler, 1945-1970. Harvill.
Machida. (2014). Who Supports Nuclear Armament in Japan? Threat Perceptions and Japan’s Nuclear Armament. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 128–146.
Narang, V. (2022). Seeking the Bomb: Strategies of Nuclear Proliferation. Princeton Studies in International History and Politics, 400.
Samuels, & Schoff, J. L. (2015). Japan’s Nuclear Hedge: Beyond “Allergy” and Breakout. Political Science Quarterly, 130(3), 475–503.
Scott, S. d. (n.d.). Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security, Vol. 21(No. 3 (Winter, 1996-1997),), 54–86.
Sechser, & Fuhrmann, M. (2017). Nuclear weapons and coercive diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.
Statista. (2023). Number of operable nuclear power reactors worldwide as of May 2023, by country.
Volpe. (2023). Leveraging latency : how the weak compel the strong with nuclear technology. Oxford University Press.
Zimmermann, & Eibl, F. (2000). Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1969. De Gruyter.